Teleconference video, Feb. 28, 2024: Steele on AE911Truth Supreme Court challenge; McKee on why Lloyde England exposes Pentagon cover-up
Our February teleconference featured two speakers: Andy Steele of AE911Truth updated the group on AE’s challenge to the Supreme Court about a lower court ruling that government agencies are under no obligation to ensure that positions they take are based on the truth.
The second speaker was Craig McKee (starting at 28:25), who shared a PowerPoint presentation on the evidence concerning Lloyde England, the taxi driver whose car was supposedly impaled by a light pole hit by the plane that the official story alleges hit the Pentagon. Craig urges people who want to understand the importance of the England evidence, and the disinformation used by some in the Truth Movement to distort England’s story, to read his two-part investigation of the topic on Truth and Shadows.
https://truthandshadows.com/2019/03/20/lloyde-englands-tall-pentagon-tale-part-1/
https://truthandshadows.com/2019/04/28/coste-chandler-fraud-about-england-part-2/
This was followed by a discussion that touched on subjects like Covid and Gaza.
Attending the teleconference were: Cheryl Curtiss, Craig McKee, Barrie Zwicker, Andy Steele, Jon Olsen, John O’Malley, Nita Renfrew, and Mike Cook.
Our next meeting is March 27at the usual time (8 p.m. EST, 5 p.m. PST). The agenda will go out on March 24. If anyone is ever having a problem locating the agenda in their inbox, you can always just check this site, where it is posted at the same time the email notification goes out.
It's interesting to see how architects for an engineered truth are trying to set themselves up as the only organisation or body taking on NIST in 2023 / 2024, when two separate whistleblower RFC's were filed against NIST in 2007 already!
These two whistleblower cases then turned into two Qui-Tam court cases against 23 NIST subcontractors for SCIENCE FRAUD in the same year... This was BEFORE architects for an engineered truth's website was even live... Two of the main subcontractors, ARA and SAIC were tasked with the security and cleanup at ground zero...
Even then architects for an engineered truth was working against these professors to keep attention away from their court cases. You should ask the important question WHY!?
Do ANY of the 9/11 "truther" organisations ever talk about SAIC or ARA?
Link: https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional
One of these cases ended up being filed in the US Supreme Court in 2009.
Yet - NONE of the so called "truthers" mention these cases OR the evidence contained in these three cases - WHY!?
Richard Gage denying any knowledge of the cases, yet the video also shows where he admits he does know about them, so why lie, Richard?
Video: https://rumble.com/v3g82mu-911-truth-what-does-it-take-for-you-to-distrust-someone.html
Why does Ted Walter also lie? - https://rumble.com/v3mmu61-the-disingenuous-search-for-911-justice.html
Could it be because it proves the narratives of explosions, thermite or nukes are completely null and void?
Why does Wikipedia allow all these 9/11 "conspiracy theories" that goes against the government narrative, but NOT the information with regards to these three court cases?
Why has this been actively put on a BLOCK LIST since 2010...
Read more here: https://911revision.substack.com/p/wikipedias-block-listed-911-scientist
This leaves you with a rather simple question: Is the 9/11 "truther" movement a disingenuous distraction movement?
What makes a REAL 9/11 truth seeker: https://rumble.com/v4g13oo-what-makes-a-911-truth-seeker.html